![]() |
|||||
| TEAM | GET IT | ||||
|
|
|||||
![]() |
2006 Vegas
Re-Evolution in Conventional C-Kite Technology Refusing to be Flavor of the Month Testimonials Check out this action-packed technical presentation. |
||||
| Refusing to be Flavor of the Month | |||||
|
|
Trends Come & Go There has been a lingering belief among kiteboarding manufacturers recently, that, in order to have a high performance kite that takes a step forward from their current designs, they must completely re-invent what we have come to know as the conventional C-Kite. North Kiteboarding didn’t buy it, instead charging their own path forward. Kiteboarding manufacturers attempted to answer the inherent depower problem by creating the "Bow" kite -- a flatter, bridled kite that claimed to solve all the problems of traditional C-shaped kites. Customers rushed to the shops to be the first flat kite owners, buying into the marketing claim that eventually proved incorrect. As more brands jumped on the "bow" bandwagon, ultimately deeming a very bumpy and questionable ride, North decided to focus their R&D on what works. The History All of today’s flat/bow kites are based on the same design patent by Bruno Legaignoux, which was distributed to all current Inflatable Kite Licensee companies in early 2005. Most manufacturers started building bow kites in the last year, racing to slightly alter the design Bruno gave them, adding some unique element to claim it as their own. Add increased competition to this pressure to bring a kite product to market in less than a year, and it makes for one messy and confused market of kites. North built many flat kite prototypes throughout 2005, and found they were not well-rounded enough to put into production. But they did have extra depower, which has advantages. So they kept all the strengths of the conventional C-Kite design, and integrated some new technologies that would deliver this extra depower that kiteboarders were looking for. Instead of re-inventing a kite, they evolved their already successful designs. The design innovations on the new 2006 Vegas are delivering kiteboarders everything they wanted in a kite: Exceptional bar/kite response, better hang time, smooth and steady power, and complete depower capabilities. Safety Safety has been the biggest claim by bow kite manufacturers. However, the bow kite safety claim was tossed out when incidents of the kite inverting, “bow-tying” and tangling within its own bridles became more common. If the kite powers up in these situations, the only safety measure is to release the kite completely, forcing the rider to swim back to the beach without his kite. Bow kites do have great depower and relaunch capabilities, but the inverting and bridle issues rendered all new technology useless, raising questions about the bow kite trend. In a recent test of High Depower C-Kites vs. Bow Kites, conducted by kiteboarding.de Magazine, it states: "A major drawback of bow kites is the possibility of inverting. This is an inherent danger of all bow kites, especially if the front tubes are inflated to the maximum. If the kite inverts, the safety system is no longer effective when the bar is released. This nullifies the safety benefits of bow kites and forces the rider to completely release the kite. Since many bow kites come without a safety leash, this is far from being a good solution." North's safety system with its own 5th Element technology has proved successful for depower. Adapted by almost all riders as the most reliable leash landing and recovery depower system, the 5th Element makes for quick relaunch in any situation. Ditch the kite and bar for 100% depower leash safety without sacrificing your kite to the wind. Performance Bow kites have gotten close to the performance achieved by average C-Kites, but have lost points in many areas. The most significant performance benefit lost in the bow kites is bar feel. Because a bow kite bar is attached to the kite via a bridle and pulley system, the rider loses direct response to the kite. The Vegas, has the benefit of conventional C-Kite bar feel, but with a light touch. No intense bar pressure here. Light to touch, easy to turn, and easy to feel. In the same kite test as mentioned above, kiteboarding.de offers their own opinion on the Vegas: "The North Vegas combines the familiar bar feeling of a C-Kite with maximum depower and still reaches top test results in all aspects of performance." Straight from the Horse's Mouth North Kite Designer, Ken Winner, might be a little biased about the Vegas, but you gotta hand it to him -- the kite works. In fact, the kite does everything a rider could want in a kite without the worries. Ken gave us a little of his own words on the Vegas versus Bow debate: "I hear all the time from people who jumped on the latest faddish kite bandwagon and were cruelly disappointed by the performance and handling problems they found there. The Rhino seems to be the ticket for a lot of experienced riders looking for big air and overall snappy performance. The Vegas works really well for riders who want a ton of depower but don't want to give up great performance. Both the Rhino and Vegas have a solid, positive feel on the bar -- not mushy and imprecise -- so the rider knows where the kite is without looking at it. At the same time, the Rhino has as much depower as most experienced riders will ever need, and the Vegas has huge depower." |
||||
|
|
|||||